Prediction: the enemy of strategic thinking

by Maree on 31 December 2009

prediction = crystal ball gazingToday, two emails have crossed my desk which have both had ‘2010 predictions’ in them. Another email was a review of their 2009 predictions with some thinly veiled justifications about why some of those predictions didn’t eventuate.  Three hits on my scanning radar, and out popped the title of this post.

Predictions are based on our understanding of the past and the present. They have less to do with what might happen in the future, and more to do with the writer succumbing to the ‘top 10 list’ syndrome that afflicts us at this time of the year.  In this era of data driven decision making, why do we believe that predictions are valid when they are little more than crystal ball gazing?

Strategic thinking is taking a deliberate stance to think about what the future might bring, and then decide how to respond today. Strategic thinking always, let me repeat that, always takes the view that there are multiple possible futures, not one certain future. It involves people sharing their knowledge, expertise and informed intuition to build a shared view of what the future might bring – not will bring. You cannot predict the future, except by luck.

You have to spend time in future spaces to think about what might happen before you have any informed idea about what the future might bring. Predictions take what’s happening today and say the future will be more of the same. The people who write predictions cross their fingers and hope that they won’t get found out in a year’s time. Predictions assume certainty, strategic thinking embraces uncertainty.

Predictions are just put ‘out there’. There’s no value in them except for a bit of comic relief in most cases. Strategic thinking takes informed views about possible futures and generates value by identifying a range of strategic options today to ensure their organisation is sustainable no matter what future eventuates.

If you want to think strategically, stop thinking about predictions and move to the possibility space – where you ask questions such as: What is possible and why? What does it mean for us? How might we respond? What can we do now? Predictions trigger no such questioning because their writers assume their is no human choice influencing the future. They assume the future is fixed because it will be a linear projection of today.

Think back 10 years and think about how much the world has changed since then (think about ipods and iphones, social media and the scope of the internet). Talk to your colleagues about the speed of change. Think about how the way you work and communicate has shifted. Think about what that scale and pace of change might been for the next 10 years. Then try and write ‘my top 10 predictions for next year’ at your own peril. Instead, write about how major trends emerging today might shape your future, and the 10 things you can do to be ready to respond quickly to however those trends play out over time.

Prediction is the enemy of strategic thinking, and the sooner we stop thinking we can fix the future, the more robust our strategic thinking will be today.

Bookmark and Share

{ 2 comments }

Climate Change and the Need to Act

by Maree on 8 December 2009

Clean energy conceptA personal posting this one, rather than one focused in my Thinking Futures space.

I’ve been watching, pondering and musing of late about the debate on whether climate change is real or not.  Here in Australia, we have just witnessed the extraordinary spectacle of a political party (the Liberal Party) imploding around this issue – driven by disagreement about approaches to climate change, and strong resistance to an opposition leader who – horrors of horrors – wanted to come to an agreement with the government about an emissions trading scheme.

Issues about the validity of ETS aside, the Liberal’s approach was to cast the whole issue as ‘a new tax’, with predictable outcomes. I couldn’t help thinking – again – about why politicians can’t lift their sights, and help the public lift its collective sights, above the here and now. Climate change is an issue that we need to take a longer term view on, and ask the simple question, what might happen if we don’t act now?

Today, I came across some comments in an email conversation by Andrew Curry, who writes at Next Wave on this very question.  He writes:

For my part, it is fairly clear that the climate change bet is the modern equivalent of Pascal’s wager: if they’re right, and we’ve done something effective about the risk, we might just about get away with low enough levels of global warming to muddle through. If they’re right and we do nothing, we’ll be heading fast for four or five or six degrees (and I hope our kids and grandchildren forgive us); if they’re wrong, and we do something, the cost will have been quite low, since we’ll largely have done things which improve resource outcomes, which are an issue regardless of climate change; if they’re wrong, and we do nothing … well, that’s the bet you seem to be making and you’d better hope you’re right.

Emission trading schemes may not be perfect, but we need to do something now, and let’s all hope and pray that the Copenhagen Summit reaches that same conclusion and agrees on some action.

Bookmark and Share

{ 0 comments }

Higher Education Futures: are we ready for the challenge?

November 28, 2009

There is much written about how learning will need to be delivered into the future – that online delivery will move to a new level and that the way we develop and run courses will move from a content driven to a facilitation driven approach, and that the role of academic staff will change accordingly.
I’ve [...]

Read the full article →

Life happens online too…

November 15, 2009

In the last week,  I’ve heard several comments about how online communication isn’t real communication. The assumption underpinning these comments is that to really communicate you have  to have a face-to-face conversation.  Anything else just isn’t real.
In a room of 50 people last week, the question was posed: who in the room uses Twitter?  I [...]

Read the full article →

Beyond Strategic Planning

November 1, 2009

I’m wondering whether organisations are ready to move beyond the formulaic approach to strategic planning and build a focus on improving the quality of strategic thinking – the thinking that goes into the decisions and the subsequent actions that are then documented in a plan.  We spend a lot of time on the plan now, [...]

Read the full article →

Web 2.0 and Student Engagement

November 1, 2009

Web 2.0 has been with us for a while now, and we are starting to see signs of Web 3.0, the semantic web, entering the mainstream. The key feature of Web 2.0 is that it provides the opportunity for us to produce and share content with the world.
I came across this comment recently:
The internet has [...]

Read the full article →

Three Things That Make a Difference

October 20, 2009

One of the things I do in my work is to help people write strategic plans. The first thing I do is read their existing plan. So far, by my standards, about 99% of them have been too long, too complicated and have too many goals. The result? The plans are usually ignored as a [...]

Read the full article →

Dislodging Events for Higher Education

August 4, 2009

In the latest issue of the Chronicle of Higher Education (3 August 2009), Robert Zemsky writes about ‘dislodging events’ that would need to happen to create the conditions for meaningful reform to higher education in the USA.  He offers three such events: nuking the current federal student aid program, taxing institutional endowments unless institutions drew [...]

Read the full article →

Thinking about the Future – Too Hard??

August 2, 2009

Distracted as we are by the cult of busyness at work, it’s easier to do rather than think. Many planning workshop attendees seem to be more interested in the quick fix (tell me what to do tomorrow) than where their organisation is heading in the long term.
This might be because the long term requires time [...]

Read the full article →

Scenarios and Terminology

July 31, 2009

It’s the thinking that matters with scenarios
Scenario Planning is a term often used to describe the process of creating ideas about, and images of, future worlds to provide a long term context for strategic thinking. I won’t dwell on the various criticisms of the method, except to say that I agree with Richard Slaughter’s view [...]

Read the full article →